Some argue that non-presentist A-theories face an epistemic objection: if they were true, then we could not know whether we are present. I argue that the presentist is in no better an epistemic position than the non-presentist. In §1 I introduce the sceptical puzzle: I look at two ways in which the non-presentist could claim that our experiences give us evidence for our presentness, but find each wanting. In §2, I argue that the puzzle also faces the presentist, and that a number of potential solutions either fail or are equally available to the non-presentist. I conclude by defending one solution to the puzzle.
I love this post. I think that living in the present means, only focusing on the things are are in motion for example: Present = I am headed to the grocery store.
Past= I have been needing to go to the grocery store for a while now. Future= I will head to the grocery store in a few minutes. By living in the present, you have more power of the current situation and it allows you to create the circumstances.
http://thedistnction.com speaks more about creating circumstances, using the power of the present. I encourage everyone to visit!
酒店經紀 酒店小姐 酒店經紀公司
台北酒店工作 台北酒店經紀人 酒店兼差 酒店兼職 酒店公關 酒店上班 台北酒店上班 酒店打工 酒店工作內容 酒店pt 台北酒店 便服店 禮服店 酒店 酒店工作 酒店上班時間 酒店上班薪水 酒店上班內容 現領 當日領 酒店經紀 酒店打工 酒店工作 酒店上班 酒店兼差 酒店兼職 打工兼差 打工兼職 台北酒店 酒店應徵 禮服店 酒店 經紀 打工 兼差便服店 台北酒店經紀 酒店薪水 酒店工作內容 酒店時間 酒店經濟 美式餐廳 咖啡廳
打工兼職 打工兼差 酒店營業時間
It's a helpful and nice article,
thanks for this helpful post
What do you think about these theories?
Post a Comment